Clement Law Center - Federal Way Family Law Attorney
Free Initial Consultation
Our office is open. At Clement Law Center, the safety and wellbeing of our clients and employees come first. In response to COVID-19, court hearings and all conferences with client and prospective clients will be by phone. We are not conducting in-person court hearings or meetings. Our staff will often be working remotely during this time. Our office will be checking voicemail and will return client calls as soon as possible. We continue to offer free phone consultations.
We offer a 25% discount to First Responders and Health Care Workers
Quality Representation & Individualized Advocacy You Can Depend On

Distribution of Assets and Debts in a Divorce

On Behalf of | Nov 14, 2014 | Divorce

Each Spouse Owes a Fiduciary Duty to the Other

Both spouses owe a fiduciary duty to disclose all community and separate property assets prior to the entry of a Decree of Dissolution. In re Marriage of Sievers, 78 Wn. App. 287, 310, 897 P.2d 388 (1995). This fiduciary duty is continuing; it does not cease upon physical separation, or the contemplation or pendency of a dissolution proceeding. In re Marriage of Sanchez, 33 Wn. App. 215, 218, 654 P.2d 702 (1982); Seals v. Seals, 22 Wn. App. 652, 655-56, 590 P.2d 1301 (1979).


Future Earning Potential Is Relevant in the Distribution of Property

Future earning potential “is a substantial factor to be considered by the trial court in making a just and equitable property distribution.” In re Marriage of Rockwell, 141 Wn. App. 235, 248, 170 P.3d 572 (2007); See also In re Marriage of Hall, 103 Wn.2d 236, 248, 692 P.2d 175 (1984). A disproportionate allocation of the net marital estate may be appropriate when one spouse is likely to enjoy substantially more income in the future.


The Trial Court Has Broad Discretion

Courts have broad discretion in valuing property, and the trial court’s decision will be overturned only if there has been a manifest abuse of discretion. In re Marriage of Gelesby, 89 Wn. App. 390, 403, 948 P.2d 1338 (1997). Property distributions do not need to be equal in order to be just and equitable. See, e.g., In re Marriage of Tower, 55 Wn. App. 697, 780 P.2d 863 (1989); In re Marriage of Nicholson, 17 Wn. App. 110, 117, 561 P.2d 1116 (1977). A disproportionate award is within the trial court’s discretion. 20 Washington Practice, Family and Community Property Law, Section 32.8.3 (1997); In re Marriage of Davison, 112 Wn. App. 251, 258-59, 48 P.3d 358 (2002); In re Marriage of Dessauer, 97 Wn.2d 831, 650 P.2d 1099 (1982).



DISCLAIMER: This Legal Guide is provided for general educational purposes only. By using or participating in this site you agree and understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the attorney author. The law changes frequently, and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The information provided in this Legal Guide is general in nature and may not apply to the factual circumstances in your situation. The applicable law may be different in the State or States where the relevant facts occurred. For a definitive solution to your situation you should seek legal advice from an attorney who (1) is licensed to practice in the state which has jurisdiction; (2) has experience in the area of law you are asking about, and (3) has been retained as your attorney for representation or consultation. (C) Bruce Clement


Start Your Free Consultation

Our Office Locations

Federal Way Office
31919 1st Avenue South, Suite 103
Federal Way, WA 98003

Toll Free:888-351-6779
Phone: 253-954-3351
Fax: 253-815-8458
Federal Way Office Location

Seattle Office
3418 NE 65th St., Suite A
Seattle, WA 98115

Toll Free: 888-351-6779
Phone: 253-954-3351
Fax: 253-815-8458
Seattle Office Location

Bellevue Office
14777 NE 40th Street, Suite 206
Bellevue, WA 98007

Toll Free: 888-351-6779
Phone: 253-954-3351
Fax: 253-815-8458
Bellevue Office Location
FindLaw Network